Thursday, 10 January 2013

The Conquest of Makkah

Causes The Conquest of Makkah

           
                         The conquest of Makkah was a great hallmark in the history of whole Muslim conquests. It

was destined for Muhammad (PBUH) "The prophet of war" to demonstrate that even in His battle He was

"the prophet."
                   
                    " In history the hero seeks the glory, not the prey". P.Sideny

                    Conquest of Makkah is renowned as the first great occupation because it was born by

moderation and clemency, rather than subdued it by violence.

Sunday, 30 December 2012

Battle of Badr (624 A.D /2 A.H.)

Battle of Badr:

                             Battle of Badr are as follows,

Causes: 

            (1)   The frustration of the leader of the hypocrites, Abdulllah Bin Ubbay in Madina. Disappointed by

Abdullah's failure in Madina, the Quraish began to stimulate the inmates of the land lying between Makkah

and Madina against Muslims.
               
             (2)   At the meadows of Madina Kurz Bin Jabir attacked and looted some animals.
           
             (3) Murder of Amr bin hazrami; The Holy Prophet (PBUH) sent a group of 10 to keep an eye on

enemy. Both parties met and murder of Amir bin Hazarami, a Quraish leader, took place mistakably.  The

Holy Prophet (PBUH) paid the blood money too.
           
            (4) Permission and obligation of Jihad in first year of Hijra.

            (5)  The Muslims intended to attack the wealthy caravan of Abu Safyan carrying merchandise but failed. Abu Jahl came with army to save his caravan and consequently the Muslims and Army of Makkah gathered at Badr to fight. 

EVENT: 

                   Muslim Army 313. Infidels Army 1000, Muslims got martyrdom 14, No. of  Army of Makkans killed 70, Unbelievers arrested 70.

Result:

               Victory of Muslims.

Tuesday, 25 December 2012

Aurangzeb; Religious policy


Aurangzeb; Religious policy, The Ideas:

 


Introduction:

                  Muhi-ud-din Muhammad Auranzeb was born on 3rd November, 1618(N.S) at Dohad near Ujjain.1 At early age he became a good scholar of Arabic and Persian, and learned Turki and Hindi as well. While he did not care for painting, music and other fine arts. At the end of 1634A.D, he was appointed mansabdar of 10,000Zat and 4,000Sawar. Then he was given charge of Bundela expedition against Jujhar Singh of Orchha, which was his first experience of war and diplomacy. So, from the very early age he acquired reputation as a good soldier, administrator and diplomat.
                 Aurangzeb was staunch Muslim who could not go against the law of Islam.5 This orthodoxy misinterpreted by historians, i.e he was intolerant to other religions. While in his own book (Waqi-i-Alamgiri) he stated, "No person shall in unlawful way interfere with or disturb the Brahmins and the other Hindus resident in their places."
                 The "Ideas" of Aurangzeb can be judged from his personality. His personality can be studied from two dimensions; as a religious man and as a statesman. As a religious man he was staunch Muslim and careful and conciliatory to non-Muslims.
                As a statesman Aurangzeb attended in person every detail of state’s administration. Due to his long term, campaigns and reduction of taxes, financially he became weak. Toward rebels and his opponents he was conciliatory in a limit while he was more conciliatory and merciful toward his allies.

Aurangzeb’s Religious policy:

Facts:

Aurangzeb’s Farman:

                   Aurangzeb addressed Abul-Hassan, the governor of Benares, which clearly shows that the Emperor was tolerant to Hindus. He stated that, “Since… all our upright intentions are engaged in promoting the public welfare and bettering the conditions of all classes, high and low; therefore accordance with our Holy law, we have decided that ancient temples shall not be overthrown, but the new one shall not be built… no person shall in unlawful way interfere with or disturb the Brahmins and other Hindu residents in the places, so that they may as before, remain in their occupation and continue with peace of mind to offer prayer for the continuance of our God-given Empire.” (J.A.S.B. and Waqi-i-Alamgiri).

Appointment of non-Muslim on high ranks offices:

                  A Farman addressed by Aurangzeb that there should be one hindu and one muslim on each of the civil and military departments of the state.There were a good number of Hindus who occupied the key posts in the civil and military department of the state during his reign. Jaswant singh who caused untold trouble and suffering to the Mughals and who went against the emperor in the war of succession and in the battle of KHAJWA. He not only pardoned him for his treacherous conduct and honored him with position of power and trust. Many Rajputs princes for Aurangzeb against the Hindus as his soldiers and generals. Such as jai singh who sent by aurangzaib to punish shiva je (1665).
Responsibility of Aurangzeb’s religious policy towards the decline of mughal empire in the view of historians:

Religious intolerance:

In the view of historians Aurangzeb was intolerant towards non-Muslims. In issuing ordinance, Aurangzeb was not favoring Hindus, but only enforcing Islamic law. He would destroy new temples and would not allow old temples to be repaired, but he would not permit old temples to be demolished. While on the other place the writer said that these restrictions did not apply on rajputs, not presumably to the other Hindu material communities whose services Aurangzeb needed. This shows two opposite interpretations of the writer.
             One writer gave the reference of Manucci that the higher of the court who were Hindus should not longer hold their charges. While in contrast he written that in the second half of the Aurangzeb’s reign the percentage of Hindu officers was higher than ever before under the Mughals___ in the rank of commander of 5,000 and above, it was 32.9% under Aurangzeb as against 14% under Akbar’s reign; among all officers of the rank of 500 and above, it was 31.6% under Aurangzeb as against 22.5% under Akbar’s reign.
         Orthodox personality of Aurangzeb is described by historians as anti-Hindu. That during the reign of Aurangzeb’s predecessor’s large number of Hindus was made Mansabdar. But Aurangzeb, however, avoided this practice. Thus total number of Hidus Mansabdar fell.18  While some historians accepted that the number of Hindus, holding high position in the Mughal service under Aurangzeb was greater than any of his predecessor.
The historian tried to prove that the religious policy of Auaranzeb caused the opposition of Hindus which caused the decline of Mughal Empire. It is said that Auarangzeb bigotry was responsible for the Hindu revivalist movement. There is little doubt that even if there had been no Aurangzeb the Hindu revivalist movement would have come.

The Ideas of Aurangzeb:

              The Ideas of a person can be judged from his actions. Aurangzeb ruled almost 50 years, which shows that he had sage political Ideas. On the other hand the historians considered him staunch Muslim and were conciliatory toward non-Muslims which show that he had responsible personality.

Aurangzeb as a statesman and historians:

              As a ruler, Aurangzeb attended in person to every detail of the state administration. He was past master in diplomacy. He could not be beaten in any kind of intrigue or secret manipulation. He was a master of pen and sword. On the other hand some historians considered him a fail administrator. One writer stated that his excessive distrust of officials and constant interference in the business of different department kept the local officials in a state of uncertainty and destroyed their initiative and efficiency. This led to administrative degeneration. If his direct interference in state business was degenerated his administration system then how was it possible that he ruled almost 50 years with success.

Aurangzeb policies:

              The policies of Aurangzeb were of different kinds; his financial policy, his imperialistic policy, his military policy and his diplomatic policy.

Financial policy:

          When Aurangzeb sat on the throne, in the economic sphere he showed a determined opposition to all illegal exactions (abwab) and all the taxes which not authorized by Islamic law. On the other hand his imperialistic design became a burden on treasury of the state. It shows that Aurangzeb no bright idea about economy.

Imperialistic policy:

        During the long reign of Aurangzeb, the Mughal Empire reached to its maximum extent. Imperialistic idea of Aurangzeb can be judged through his expansionist policy. As an imperial authority he is considered on the front on Mughal’s dynasty.

Military policy:

           Aurangzeb was following the same military system as his predecessors were adopted i.e. Mansabdari system. The vast empire and his successful campaigns indicated that he was a great general and had healthy and strong military system.

Diplomatic policy:

           Aurangzeb was a past master in diplomacy. In his diplomatic field he was the man of conciliatory approach. Some historians criticized him that he reversed the Rajput policy of Akbar. In fact, he rejected the matrimonial alliances with Rajputs, he adopted the conciliatory approach to Rajputs, on the death of Maharaja Jaswant Singh Aurangzeb ordered the two widows of Maharaja Jaswant Singh to be detained at the Mughal court along with their sons. Aurangzeb was not willing to subjugate Rajputs but he wanted to protect the successors of Maharaja from other chiefs who were in the lust of power.
            An emperor can’t bear rebellious activity in his empire so, when Marathas started rebellious activities against the Mughal Empire, Aurangzeb was compelled to pressurize them. Till the death of Aurangzeb were able to start rebellious activities against the emperor.
              Aurangzeb has been criticized on the eve of crushing Sikh community. No doubt he did this, not because of an anti- non-Muslims policy but because of the political activities of Sikhs; such as Guru Govind Singh organized the Khalsa into military organization which compelled him to suppress them.
              Aurangzeb was a staunch Muslim but it did not mean that he was against non-Muslims. As a statesman he was just a ruler and not a religious man because he started his first campaign against the people of North West Frontier who were Muslims and next campaign was against Golcunda and Bijapur whose rulers were also Muslims.

Critical analysis/Conclusion:

                                      Aurangzeb has been criticized by historians on the eve of his religious policy and administration. In the regime of Aurangzeb Hindus had not an energetic opportunity to stand against Aurangzeb, because the sources of communication among the states were strengthen and among Hindu rajas or chiefs were weak and this situation became opposite in Aurangzeb’s successor’s regime.
In Aurangzeb’s regime Hindus were in the process of development and in the reign of his successors they had achieved a bit development, like their communication became stronger. There was no direct relation between villages in Aurangzeb’s reign. Being a strong and effective ruler his central government was effective and controlled the remote areas effectively. The successors of Auangzeb were not as much effective to control remote states through central government and Subadars and Jagirdars enjoyed virtual autonomy.
The provincial chiefs wanted to strengthen themselves against central government and Hindu rajas being unable to overthrown the provincial chiefs, made alliances with chiefs and shared power with them, which empowered the governors and the Hindu community and some provincial chiefs declared their states independent.
The fall of the Mughal power has been, by some, regarded in term of Muslims decline and Hindu revival, a view which has been challenged by such scholars as Dr. Tara Chand and Dr. Percival Spear. According to former, the Hindus and Muslims culture were both in this period static and stagnant as compared with new outlook on life of the European people under the Intellectual revolution of the age of reason or Enightenment which posed intricate economic, political and social problems or worldwide significance.
The death of Aurangzeb on March 3, 1707 A.C. is generally regarded as marking the beginning of the end of the Mughal Empire. If implication is to hold Aurangzeb responsible for creating situation which brought about the disintegration of the empire then such an inference is neither nor fair, that Alamgir battled with internal and external enemies of empire courageously, no one would deny. For nearly half a century he maintained the power and prestige of Mughal Empire, sustained the unity of the country. So dear to him and kept the ship of the state on an even keel. These were his great administrative malaise of empire was so deep-rooted that no one could have permanently cured it.In short it can be said that Aurangzeb can not be directed for the decline of the Mughal Empire because Aurangzeb is the least understood of Indian monarchs.

Thursday, 20 December 2012

Golden Age of Islam

Islamic Golden Age

                                                                         



The Abbasid dynasty rose to power in 750, consolidating the gains of the earlier Caliphates. Initially, they conquered Mediterranean islands including the Balearics and Sicily. The ruling party had come to power on the wave of dissatisfaction with the Ummayads, cultivated by the Abbasid revolutionary Abu Muslim. Under the Abbasids Islamic civilization flourished. Most notable was the development of Arabic prose and poetry, termed by The Cambridge History of Islam as its "golden age". Commerce and industry (considered a Muslim Agricultural Revolution) and the arts and sciences (considered a Muslim Scientific Revolution) also prospered under Abbasid caliphs al-Mansur (ruled 754 — 775), Harun al-Rashid (ruled 786 — 809), al-Ma'mun (ruled 809 — 813) and their immediate successors.

Universal Golden period


Eastern hemisphere's States and Empires (820) Abbasid Caliphate
Aghlabids
Idrisid dynasty Multan
Sultans of Sindh
Iberian Umayyads

Decentralized territory
Umayyads (Córdoba)
Idrisids (Berbers)
Rustamid (Ibādiyya of Tahirid)
Aghlabids (Emirate of Ifriqiya)
Tulunids/Irshkids
Qarmatians (Carmathians) Buyjids (Tahirids)
Alijds (Ziyarids)
Hamdanid (Marwanid/Uqaylid)
Samanids (Greater Khorasan)
Saffrids (Baloch)
Sajids (Shirvanshah)

Regions are approximate, consult particular article for details.


The capital was moved from Damascus to Baghdad, due to the importance placed by the Abbasids upon eastern affairs in Persia and Transoxania. At this time the caliphate showed signs of fracture amid the rise of regional dynasties. Although the Ummayad family had been killed by the revolting Abbasids, one family member, Abd ar-Rahman I, escaped to Spain and established an independent caliphate there in 756. In the Maghreb, Harun al-Rashid appointed the Arab Aghlabids as virtually autonomous rulers, although they continued to recognise central authority. Aghlabid rule was short-lived, and they were deposed by the Shiite Fatimid dynasty in 909. By around 960, the Fatimids had conquered Abbasid Egypt, building a capital there in 973 called "al-Qahirah" (meaning "the planet of victory", known today as Cairo). In Persia the Turkic Ghaznavids snatched power from the Abbasids. Abbasid influence had been consumed by the Great Seljuq Empire (a Muslim Turkish clan which had migrated into mainland Persia) by 1055.

Wednesday, 19 December 2012

The sayings of Hazrat Umar (R.A).




The sayings of Hazrat Umar

Hazrat Umar said that: 

       

 "Remember all ye people: I have been given the rule over you on the assumption of being the best qualified and strongest among you and the ablest of you to conduct your general affairs. O God, I am harsh, soften me; I am weak, strengthen me; I am stingy, render me generous."

Monday, 17 December 2012

THE PERSONALITY OF THE HOLY PROPHET (PBUH)

THE CHARACTER AND PERSONALITY OF THE HOLY PROPHET (PBUH) 

                 A character analysis and personality estimation of the Holy Prophet (PBHU) ranks him highest in the world. He was certainly a man of many parts. He was a successful general, an able administrator a wise law-given, a skillful military organiser, a brave soldier, a trusted friend a faithful husband, and above all an embodiment of all the virtues that could possibly be found in all human beings. Throughout Makkan period, He showed extreme restraint and never let His enemies raise finger at His character. He was called Sadiq (truthful) and Amin. All aspects of his personality are so illuminating that we can get guidance from them.

Saturday, 15 December 2012

What is Mulism Modernism

Muslim Modernism

Introduction

Muslim Modernism is a movement that has been described as "the first Muslim ideological response" to the cultural challenges which attempts to reconcile Islamic faith with modern values regarding nationalism, democracy, civil rights, rationality, equality and progress. It featured a "critical reexamination of the classical conceptions and methods of jurisprudence" and a new approach to Islamic theology and Quranic exegesis.
Characteristics of the Muslim Modernism
Response to threats from European colonialism in late 19th, early 20th centuries Consisted of legal, educational and social reforms aimed at rescuing Muslim societies from their decline and demonstrating the compatibility of Islam with modern Western thoughts and values Used by Muslim governments to justify unpopular and misunderstood reform measures Reactions to this “Westernizing” of Islam led to the formation of modern Islamist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood Catalyst for modern Islamic reform: Jamal al-Din al-Afghani - traveled throughout the Muslim world calling for internal reform to defend, strengthen Islam and drive out the West - Muslims required to reclaim reason, science and technology to reassert Islamic identity and solidarity Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida: Great synthesizers of modern Islam, built on Afghani’s effort - Religion, reason and science are complementary; Islam’s decline due to un-Islamic religious practices spread of Sufi passivity and fatalism, rigid views of scholars - Regulations governing worship are immutable, but regulations on social affairs are open to change - True Islamic governments are required to implement Islamic law, pan-Islamic unity needed to restore the caliphate - shifted position of the Salafiyya movement to more critical of the West: its secular nationalism and capitalist exploitation are political and religious threats.

Muhammad Iqbal:

Muslims must return to the past for principles and values that can be used to construct a modern Islamic society. Nationalism is a tool used by the colonialists to dismember the Islamic world; the trans-national Muslim community needs pan-Islamism tempered by political realism to unify against such threats.
Fazlur Rahman
He was professor of Islamic thought at the University of Chicago and McGill University, and an expert in Islamic philosophy. Not as widely known as his scholar-activist contemporary Ismail Raji al-Faruqi, he is nonetheless considered an important figure for Islam in the 20th century. He argued that the basis of Islamic revival was the return to the intellectual dynamism that was the hallmark of the Islamic scholarly tradition (these ideas are outlined in Revival and Reform in Islam: A Study of Islamic Fundamentalism and his magnum opus, Islam). He sought to give philosophy free rein, and was keen on Muslims appreciating how the modern nation-state understood law, as opposed to ethics; his view being that the shari'ah was a mixture of both ethics and law. He was critical of historical Muslim theologies and philosophies for failing to create a moral and ethical worldview based on the values derived from the Qur'an: 'moral values', unlike socioeconomic values, 'are not exhausted at any point in history' but require constant interpretation. Rahman was driven to exile from his homeland, Pakistan, where he was part of a committee which sought to interpret Islam for the fledging modern state. Some of his ideas from English (which he claimed were from the Islamic tradition) were reprinted in Urdu and caused outrage among conservative Muslim scholars in Pakistan. These were quickly exploited by opponents of his political paymaster, General Ayyub Khan, and led to his eventual exile in the United States.
Muhammad Iqbal
He sought an Islamic revival based on social justice ideals and emphasized traditional rules, e.g. against usury. He argued strongly that dogma, territorial nationalism and outright racism, all of which were profoundly rejected in early Islam and especially by Muhammad himself, were splitting Muslims into warring factions, encouraging materialism and nihilism. His thought was influential in the emergence of a movement for independence of Pakistan, where he was revered as the national poet. Indirectly this strain of Islam also influenced Malcolm X and other figures who sought a global ethic through the Five Pillars of Islam. Iqbal can be credited with at least trying to reconstruct Islamic thought from the base, though some of his philosophical and scientific ideas would appear dated to us now. His basic ideas concentrated on free-will, which would allow Muslims to become active agents in their own history. His interest in Nietzsche (who he called 'the Wise Man of Europe') has led later Muslim scholars to criticise him for advocating dangerous ideals that, according to them, have eventually formed in certain strains of pan-Islamism. Some claim that the Four Pillars of the Green Party honor Iqbal and Islamic traditions.

Muhammad Hamid Ullah

Muhammad Hamid Ullah (9 February 1908 - 17 December 2002) belonged to a family of scholars, jurists, writers and sufis. He was a world-renowned scholar of Islam and International Law from India, who was known for contributions to the research of the history of Hadith, translations of the Qur'an, the advancement of Islamic learning, and to the dissemination of Islamic teachings in the Western world.

Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr

He was an Iraqi Shi'a cleric, a philosopher, and ideological founder of Islamic Dawa Party born in al-Kazimiya, Iraq. Mohammad Baqir Al-Sadr's political philosophy, known as Wilayat Al-Umma (Governance of the people), set out his view of a modern day Islamic state. His most famous philosophical works include: Falsafatuna (Our Philosophy) in which he refutes modern philosophical schools and asserts an Islamic view, and Al-Usus al-Mantiqiyyah lil-Istiqra' (The Logical Basis of Induction) in which he develops a theory which allows one to reach certainty through inductive methods.

Morteza Motahhari

He was a lecturer at Tehran University. Motahhari is considered important for developing the ideologies of the Islamic Republic. He wrote on exegesis of the Qur'an, philosophy, ethics, sociology, history and many other subjects. In all his writings the real object he had in view was to give replies to the objections raised by others against Islam, to prove the shortcomings of other schools of thought and to manifest the greatness of Islam. He believed that in order to prove the falsity of Marxism and other ideologies like it, it was necessary not only to comment on them in a scholarly manner but also to present the real image of Islam.

Ali Shariati

He was a sociologist and a professor of Mashhad University. He was one of the most influential figures in the Islamic world in the 20th century. He attempted to explain and provide solutions for the problems faced by Muslim societies through traditional Islamic principles interwoven with and understood from the point of view of modern sociology and philosophy. Shariati was also deeply influenced by Mowlana and Muhammad Iqbal.

Musa al-Sadr

He was a prominent Muslim intellectual and one of the most influential Muslim philosophers of 20th century. He is most famous for his political role, but he was also a philosopher who had been trained by Allameh Tabatabaei. As Professor Seyyed Hossein Nasr said: "his great political influence and fame was enough for people to not consider his philosophical attitude, although he was a well-trained follower of long living intellectual tradition of Islamic Philosophy". One of his famous writings is a long introduction for the Arabic translation of Henry Corbin's History of Islamic Philosophy.

Syed Zafarul Hasan

He was a prominent twentieth-century Muslim philosopher. From 1924 to 1945 he was professor of philosophy at the Muslim University, Aligarh - where he also served as Chairman of the Department of Philosophy and Dean of the Faculty of Arts. There, in 1939, he put forward the 'Aligarh Scheme'. From 1945 until the partition of the sub-continent, Dr Hasan was Emeritus Professor at Aligarh. Dr. Zafarul Hasan was born on February 14, 1885. He died on June 19, 1949.
Ismail al-Faruqi
He looked more closely at the ethics and sociology of knowledge, concluding that no scientific method or philosophy could exist that was wholly ignorant of a theory of conduct or the consequences a given path of inquiry and technology. His "Islamization of knowledge" program sought to converge early Muslim philosophy with modern sciences, resulting in, for example, Islamic economics and Islamic sociology.
Seyyed Hossein Nasr
He a political ecologist, argues that khalifa in Islam is fundamentally compatible with ideals of the ecology movement and peace movement, more so than conventional interpretations of Islam. He argues for an ecology-based ecumenism that would seek unity among the faiths by concentrating on their common respect for life as a Creation, i.e. the Earth's biosphere, Gaia, or whatever name. Pope John Paul II has made similar suggestions that "mankind must be reconciled to the Creation", and there is a Parliament of World Religions seeking a "global ethic" on similar grounds.
M. A. Muqtedar Khan
He is a Professor of Islam and International Relations at the University of Delaware. He is a prominent Muslim intellectual and philosopher and commentator on Islamic Thought and Global Politics. He organized the first contemporary Islamic Philosophers conference at Georgetown University in 1998. His work is on the subject of the philosophy of identity and rationality, Ijtihad, Islam and democracy and Islamic reform.

Akbar S. Ahmed

He is an anthropologist, filmmaker and an outstanding scholar on Islam, International Relations/Politics and Contemporary Islamic philosophy from Pakistan. He is Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at the American University in Washington DC and was the High Commissioner of Pakistan to UK. He has advised Prince Charles and met with President George W. Bush on Islam. His numerous books, films and documentaries have won awards. His books have been translated into many languages including Chinese and Indonesian. Ahmed is “the world’s leading authority on contemporary Islam” according to the BBC.

Javed Ahmad Ghamidi

He is a well-known Pakistani Islamic scholar, exegete, and educator. A former member of the Jamaat-e-Islami, who extended the work of his tutor, Amin Ahsan Islahi. He is frequently labeled a modernist for his insistence on the historical contextualization of Muhammad's revelation in order to grasp its true moral import.

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf

He is a well-known proponent of cultural reconciliation between the Muslim World and the West, basing his views on Classical Islamic governance's similarity to Western governance models in terms of religious freedoms and democratic inclination. Abdul Rauf is a highly-visible American-Egyptian Imam at New York's Masjid al-Farah in addition to being Founder and Chairman of Cordoba Initiative, a non-profit organization seeking to bridge the divide between the Muslim world and the West.

Mohammad Azadpur

He is an associate professor of philosophy at San Francisco State University. He teaches courses on Islamic philosophy, mysticism, and political philosophy. His research focuses on Alfarabi and Avicenna, and he does comparative work between Islamic and Heideggerian thought as well.